Remember that? A comparison of real-time versus retrospective recall of smoking lapses
Remember that? A comparison of real-time versus retrospective recall of smoking lapses
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-006x.65.2.292.a
复制
发表时间：
1997-04-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Kassel, JD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shiffman, S;Hufford, M;Kassel, JD
研究和治疗评估通常依赖于对事件的回顾性回忆。回忆的准确性是使用127名戒烟参与者的吸烟失误事件来测试的，并且使用带式计算机几乎实时地记录了失误和诱惑。这些计算机记录与12周后的回顾性记录进行了比较，重点是回忆4个内容领域的失误：情绪，活动，事件触发器和禁欲违规影响。失误的回忆是相当差的：平均kappas的项目范围从0.18到0.27。在这些领域中，评估总体行为模式回忆的平均轮廓分别为0.36、0.30、0.33和0.44。在回忆中，参与者高估了他们的负面影响和他们在此期间吸烟的数量，他们的回忆受到当前吸烟状况的影响。研究结果表明，在研究和干预中使用回忆时要谨慎。
Research and treatment assessments often rely on retrospective recall of events. The accuracy of recall was tested using accounts of smoking lapse episodes from 127 participants who had quit smoking, and lapses and temptations were recorded in near-real time using a band-held computer. These computer records were compared with retrospective accounts elicited 12 weeks later, with a focus on recall of lapses in 4 content domains: mood, activity, episode Triggers, and abstinence violation effects. Recall of lapses was quite poor: Average kappas for items ranged from 0.18 to 0.27. Mean profile rs assessing recall for the overall pattern of behavior were .36, .30, .33, and .44 for these domains, respectively. In recall, participants overestimated their negative affect and the number of cigarettes they had smoked during the lapse, and their recall was influenced by current smoking status. The findings suggest caution in the use of recall in research and intervention.