CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN SOCIAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ASSESSMENT
CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN SOCIAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ASSESSMENT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80091-7
复制
发表时间：
1995-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
MAYDEUOLIVARES, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DZURILLA, TJ;MAYDEUOLIVARES, A
目前，研究人员和临床医生需要一种可靠而有效的测量社会问题解决能力的方法，可以使用几种很有前途的工具。然而，所有这些措施都有缺点，目前没有一个对其结构效度有明确的、明确的支持。讨论了与社会问题解决措施的有效性最直接相关的概念和方法问题。就这些问题审查了现有主要文书的长处和短处。本文还回顾了与收敛效度和区别效度相关的经验证据。提出了改进这些措施的建议，并建议今后制定新的和更好的衡量社会问题解决过程和结果的措施。
Several promising instruments are currently available to researchers and clinicians who require a reliable and valid measure of social problem-solving abilities. However, all of these measures have shortcomings and none has definitive, unequivocal support for its construct validity at the present time. The conceptual and methodological issues that are most directly related to the validity of social problem-solving measures were discussed. The strengths and weaknesses of the major current instruments were examined with respect to these issues. Empirical evidence related to convergent and discriminant validity was also reviewed. Recommendations were made for the improvement of these measures as well as the future development of new and better measures of social problem-solving processes and outcomes.