A new direction for titin pulling.
A new direction for titin pulling.
复制标题
提汀拉动的新方向。
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0906989106
复制
发表时间:
2009
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
Rock,RonaldS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rock,RonaldS
Many proteins are known to serve roles as structural scaffolds in cells and tissues. These proteins maintain the shape of the cell, act as local force sensors, and are essential to form tissues that are exposed to large external forces. Although seemingly passive elements, these structural proteins have unique physical features that are worthy of a closer look. In particular, it is critically important to understand how scaffolding proteins and protein complexes respond to the high external forces commonly encountered in biology. In this issue of PNAS, Bertz et al.(1) report a remarkable new feature of these load-bearing complexes. Apparently, evolution has molded these proteins to be remarkably resistant to unfolding when pulled in the same direction as they would experience in the cell. However, in other pulling directions the complex is relatively fragile.Bertz et al.(1) found these ‘‘directional bonds’’in a complex of titin and its binding partner, telethonin (1). Titin is an enormous protein found in muscle sarcomeres, where it contributes to the organization and passive elasticity of muscle (2, 3). Two titin molecules are anchored together at the sarcomere Z-disk through an antiparallel arrangement of their N-terminal ends. Telethonin is found at this N-terminal overlap region, where it binds to two Ig domains, Z1 and Z2, from each titin molecule (4)(see Fig. 1). This whole N-terminal complex must be particularly robust to withstand the large forces found in muscle. Bertz et al.(1) focused in on this 2: 1 titin Z1Z2: telethonin complex, using an atomic force microscope to pull on and mechanically unfold the complex. Using handles attached to the C-terminal ends of the two Z2 domains, they pulled on the complex in a direction that would mimic the stretching direction within a sarcomere. What they found was surprising: not only was this the most robust protein or protein complex ever measured, but it also could withstand nearly half the force required to break a covalent bond. Clearly, there are some unusual features of this complex that lead to its remarkable stability. Even more surprising, Bertz et al.(1) found that this stability depended