Some Japanese Ways of Conducting Comparative Educational Research
Some Japanese Ways of Conducting Comparative Educational Research
复制标题
日本进行比较教育研究的一些方法
DOI：
10.1080/03050068.2020.1805862
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Akiko Hayashi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
林 安希子;Akiko Hayashi
这篇个人的、试探性的、自我反省的文章探索了日本人进行比较教育研究的一些方法。在这篇文章中，我不仅描述了一种日本式的比较教育研究，而且也描述了一种日本式的比较教育研究。我讨论的四个关键要素是：daijini(注意)、soboku(简单)、nagaime(长视角)以及Shuudan-sei和kanjin shugi(集体主义和语境主义)。就像Rapplye和Takayama最近在本杂志2020年特刊上所做的贡献一样，我的论文挑战了以英语为母语的比较教育学术所特有的西方哲学、理论和方法的自负。与这些贡献一样，这篇论文也论证了日本视角对比较教育研究的价值。对我来说，这意味着为研究方法的价值辩护，而这些方法并不是与我是日本人分不开的。
This personal, tentative, self-reflective essay explores some Japanese ways of conducting comparative educational research. In this essay, I not only describe a Japanese style of conducting comparative education research but also do so in a Japanese way. The four key elements I discuss are: daijini (taking care), soboku (simplicity), nagaime (long perspective) and shuudan-sei and kanjin shugi (collectivism and contextualism). Like Rappleye’s and Takayama’s recent contributions in the 2020 special issue of this journal, my paper challenges the taken-for-grantedness of the Western philosophies, theories, and methods characteristic of Anglophone comparative educational scholarship. Like those contributions, this paper argues for the value Japanese perspectives hold for comparative educational research. For me, this means arguing for the value of research methods that are not inseparable from my being Japanese.