When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy

When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy
复制标题

审议何时开始?

DOI:
10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
S. Niemeyer
S. Niemeyer
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Goodin;S. Niemeyer

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

政治审议既包括内部反思,也包括公众讨论。前者的重要性可能远远超过审议民主党人对话语成分的高度重视。对澳大利亚环境问题公民陪审团审议情况的分析表明,陪审员的态度在陪审团诉讼程序的“信息”阶段的变化更多,涉及到很大程度的“内部审议”,而不是在正式的“讨论”阶段。甚至在大众政治环境中,也可以想象出各种方式来唤起这种内部反思。
Political deliberation involves both internal reflection and public discussion. The former might be far more important than implied by deliberative democrats' heavy emphasis on the discursive component. Analysis of the deliberations of a citizen's jury on an Australian environmental issue shows jurors' attitudes changing more in response to the ‘information’ phase of the jury proceedings, involving a large degree of ‘deliberation within’, than during the formal ‘discussion’ phase. Various ways can be imagined for evoking internal reflection of that sort, even in mass-political settings.