Transcriptional regulation by dimerization: Two sides to an incestuous relationship
Transcriptional regulation by dimerization: Two sides to an incestuous relationship
复制标题
二聚化的转录调控:乱伦关系的两个方面
DOI:
10.1016/0092-8674(90)90207-u
复制
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
影响因子:
64.5
通讯作者:
N. Jones
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Jones
Control of transcription involves the interaction of protein factors with specific DNA sequence elements, and the ar-ray of these elements within the promoter of a gene dictates its transcriptional pattern. The last few years have seen rapid progress in the identification, characterization, and cloning of sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Many of the characterized promoter elements interact with not just one specific binding protein but a family of structurally related proteins. The size of the family can be surprisingly large: the mammalian JunlFos family consists of at least six members (for review, see Kouzarides and Ziff, 1989), and the ATFKREB family has at least seven members (Hai et al., 1989). Even more complexity is realized by the finding that many factors bind DNA as dimers, and different members of a family bind either as homodimers or as heterodimers with other members of the same family.The presence in a cell of a large repertoire of distinct complexes that can bind to a particular DNA sequence element suggests that competition for DNA binding may play a regulatory role. This is particularly relevant if the complexes differ in their ability to stimulate transcription. Such a possibility is emphasized by recent studies on two members of the Jun family, JunA and JunB (Chiu et al., 1989; Schiitte et al., 1989). Both proteins bind to the AP-1 binding site either as homodimers or as heterodimers with Fos protein. However, the consequences of binding are markedly different, since JunA can activate transcription from a promoter containing a single AP-1 site whereas JunB fails to do so. Importantly, JunB can repress JunA-mediated activation presumably by competition for binding to the AP-1 site. The physiological role of this interference or repression is not yet clear but is likely to be significant because the relative levels of JunA and JunB can differ markedly in cells responding to various stimuli. The ‘realization that transcription factors are often comprised of homo-or heterodimers that can have different binding or activation potential has emanated predominantly from the study of leucine zipper proteins. The zipper dimerization motif is immediately preceded by a region containing clusters of basic residues, and both the zipper and basic regions (the bZlP domain) are required for DNA binding. The zipper originally identified in the transcription factor C/EBP, a protein that binds to CCAAT recognition sites as well as enhancer core sequences, is characterized by heptad repeats of leucine residues (Vinson et al., 1989, and references therein). Physical studies suggest that during dimer formation these regions adopt a coiled coil structure stabilized by additional hydrophobic