Human vs. computer behavior in multi-issue negotiation
Human vs. computer behavior in multi-issue negotiation
复制标题
多问题谈判中的人机行为
DOI：
10.1109/rrs.2005.8
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Jonker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Bosse;C. Jonker
本文提出了两个实验，有助于比较人类与计算机的行为领域的多问题谈判。这些实验是一项正在进行的奋进的一部分，旨在提高计算机谈判者在与人类谈判者谈判时的质量。实验的有效性进行了测试，在封闭的多议题谈判的案例研究涉及ABMP谈判软件代理。结果确实揭示了ABMP药物的一些优点和缺点。例如，纯粹由ABMP代理进行谈判的交易公平性优于人类参与的可比谈判中的交易公平性。此外，在混合谈判中（即，涉及人类和软件代理），人类在个体性能方面胜过软件代理。根据实验结果，提出了改进ABMP药剂性能的几点建议。
This paper presents two experiments that contribute to the comparison of human- versus computer behavior in the domain of multi-issue negotiation. The experiments are part of an ongoing endeavor of improving the quality of computer negotiators when negotiating against human negotiators. The validity of the experiments was tested in a case study of closed multi-issue negotiation involving the ABMP negotiation software agents. The results indeed reveal a number of strengths and weaknesses of the ABMP agents. For example, the fairness of deals in negotiations performed purely by ABMP agents is better than the fairness of deals in the comparable negotiations in which humans were involved. Furthermore, in mixed negotiations (i.e., involving human- and software agents) the humans outperform the software agent with respect to the individual performance. Based on the results of the experiments, several suggestions are made to improve the ABMP agent's performance.