3D surface imaging for monitoring intrafraction motion in frameless stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer

3D surface imaging for monitoring intrafraction motion in frameless stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.016
复制
发表时间:
2012-11-01
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Remeijer, Peter
Remeijer, Peter
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Alderliesten, Tanja;Sonke, Jan-Jakob;Remeijer, Peter

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:通过与锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的比较,探讨表面成像在肺癌无框架立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)中监测病灶内运动的准确性。材料与方法:纳入36例患者,男18例,女18例。在每个分数中,采集三次CBCT扫描;CBCT1:治疗前,CBCT2:肿瘤错位矫正后,CBCT3:治疗后。通过将CBCT2和CBCT3登记到中期通气计划CT扫描中,推导出抽吸内运动。表面捕获与CBCT采集同时进行。回顾性地,对于每一组表面,创建一个平均表面:Surface1, Surface2和Surface3。随后,将Surface3注册到Surface2,以评估引力内运动。对于基于CBCT和基于表面成像的三维屈光度运动的差异,我们计算了组均值、系统误差、随机误差和一致限(LOA)。结果:女性的组平均误差、系统误差和随机误差均小于男性:分别为0.4 vs. 1.3、1.3 vs. 3.1和1.7 vs. 3.3 mm。对于女性患者,cbct -肿瘤和3d表面成像衍生的内缩运动之间的偏差在-3.3和4.3 mm之间(95% LOA)。结论:表面成像技术在女性患者的SBRT中是一种很有前途的技术,可用于监测眼球内运动。2012爱思唯尔爱尔兰有限公司版权所有。放射治疗与肿瘤学105 (2012):155-160
Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of surface imaging for monitoring intrafraction motion purposes in frameless stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancer by comparison with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients (18 males, 18 females) were included. During each fraction, three CBCT scans were acquired; CBCT1: before treatment, CBCT2: after correction for tumor misalignment, and CBCT3: after treatment. Intrafraction motion was derived by registering CBCT2 and CBCT3 to the mid-ventilation planning CT scan. Surfaces were captured concurrently with CBCT acquisitions. Retrospectively, for each set of surfaces, an average surface was created: Surface1, Surface2, and Surface3. Subsequently, Surface3 was registered to Surface2 to assess intrafraction motion. For the differences between CBCT- and surface-imaging-derived 3D intrafraction motions, group mean, systematic error, random error and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated.Results: Group mean, systematic and random errors were smaller for females than for males: 0.4 vs. 1.3, 1.3 vs. 3.1, and 1.7 vs. 3.3 mm respectively. For female patients deviations between CBCT-tumor- and 3D-surface-imaging-derived intrafraction motions were between -3.3 and 4.3 mm (95% LOA). For male patients these were substantially larger: -5.9-9.5 mm.Conclusion: Surface imaging is a promising technology for monitoring intrafraction motion purposes in SBRT for female patients. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 105 (2012) 155-160