Talking about inequities: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 narratives in the UK, US, and Brazil.
Talking about inequities: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 narratives in the UK, US, and Brazil.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100277
复制
发表时间：
2023-06
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Grob, Rachel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Evered, Jane A.;Castellanos, Marcelo E. P.;Dowrick, Anna;Germani, Ana Claudia Camargo Goncalves;Rai, Tanvi;de Souza, Alicia Navarro;Qureshi, Kaveri;Conceicao, Maria Ines Gandolfo;Cabral, Ivone;Grob, Rachel
2020年，COVID-19大流行造成的不成比例的死亡率和发病率负担，以及媒体对针对有色人种的公共暴力行为的一致报道，促使人们对全球、国家和地方背景下的结构性不平等进行反思。这项跨国比较分析旨在描述美国、英国和巴西的人们在感染COVID-19的经历中如何表达和理解种族、种族主义和特权。通过对我们的个人和集体立场的不断反思，我们进行了归纳比较分析，概念上位于交叉性和批判种族理论。各国使用共享的定性方法收集和分析了2020年至2023年期间有COVID-19感染经历的166人的叙述。我们选择了19个案例，这些案例说明了人们在其国家对COVID-19的观察和个人经历中对结构性特权和劣势的认识和叙述的跨国差异。美国人最能直接表达种族。在巴西，虽然一些受访者（特别是年轻人）表现出高度的种族意识，但其他人则难以确定和谈论种族关系。在英国，人们表达了种族认同，尽管通常是在白色礼貌的规范范围内，并伴随着一种不适感。调查结果总体上说明了访谈成为或没有成为表达COVID-19感染和医疗保健体验差异的社会类别和系统基础的空间的时刻。我们反映了历史和当代种族化话语的跨国差异，并阐述了在定性研究中专注于发声的影响。
Disproportionate mortality and morbidity burdens of the COVID-19 pandemic and coinciding media coverage of public acts of violence perpetrated against people of color in 2020 precipitated reckonings with structural inequities in global, national, and local contexts. This cross-country comparative analysis aims to describe how people voice and make sense race, racism, and privilege in their experiences with COVID-19 infection in the United States, United Kingdom, and Brazil. Anchored by continuous reflection on our individual and collective positionality, we conducted an inductive comparative analysis conceptually situated in intersectionality and critical race theory. Countries used a shared qualitative methodology to collect and analyze 166 narratives of people with experience of COVID-19 infection from 2020 to 2023. We selected 19 cases that illustrate cross-national differences in peoples’ acknowledgment and narration of structural privilege and disadvantage in their observations of COVID-19 in their countries and in their personal experiences. People in the US had the most fluency with voicing race directly. In Brazil, while some respondents (especially younger people) demonstrated high racial consciousness, others struggled to identify and talk about racial relationships. In the UK, people voiced racial identifications, though often within white norms of politeness and an accompanying sense of discomfort. The findings overall illustrate moments the interview becomes or does not become a space for voicing social categories and systemic underpinnings of difference in COVID-19 infections and healthcare experiences. We reflect on cross-country differences in historical and contemporary racialized discourse and elaborate on implications of focusing on voicing in qualitative research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Chapple, Alison;Ziebland, Sue
通讯作者：
Ziebland, Sue
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Wenham C;Fernandez M;Corrêa MG;Lotta G;Schall B;Rocha MC;Pimenta DN
通讯作者：
Pimenta DN
影响因子：
13.8
作者：
Cervantes L;Martin M;Frank MG;Farfan JF;Kearns M;Rubio LA;Tong A;Matus Gonzalez A;Camacho C;Collings A;Mundo W;Powe NR;Fernandez A
通讯作者：
Fernandez A
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Coyne, IT
通讯作者：
Coyne, IT
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Feagin, Joe;Bennefield, Zinobia
通讯作者：
Bennefield, Zinobia