‘Taking Back Control’, the UK’s Constitutional Narrative and Schrodinger’s Devolution

‘Taking Back Control’, the UK’s Constitutional Narrative and Schrodinger’s Devolution
复制标题

“夺回控制权”、英国宪法叙事和薛定谔的权力下放

DOI:
10.1093/pa/gsy039
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
Cathy Gormley
Cathy Gormley
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Sandford;Cathy Gormley

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

英国 2016 年退出欧盟的决定可能会引发一系列长期以来未被探讨的领土管理问题。自 1999 年以来,英国的权力下放解决方案使得不同的宪法叙事得以发展并共存。这种“建设性的模糊性”导致英国的领土治理采取“薛定谔权力下放”的形式,其中苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰已经或尚未经历根本性的宪法变革。然而,英国脱欧的技术要求将要求在迄今为止存在“建设性模糊”的情况下做出准确的决定。英国不成文的宪法、有限的政府间关系以及缺乏共同规则机制意味着这些技术决策有可能导致持续的政治不稳定。
The UK’s decision to leave the European Union in 2016 threatens to open up a range of territorial management issues that have long remained unexplored. Since 1999, the UK’s devolution settlements have allowed divergent constitutional narratives to develop and to co-exist. This ‘constructive ambiguity’ has led UK territorial governance to take the form of ‘Schrodinger’s devolution’, where Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have and have not experienced fundamental constitutional change. However, the technical requirements of Brexit will mandate the need for exact decisions where ‘constructive ambiguity’ has existed up to now. The UK’s unwritten constitution, limited intergovernmental relations and a lack of shared rule mechanisms mean that these technical decisions have the potential to lead to ongoing political instability.
自治与相互依存之间:苏格兰公投后共同统治的挑战
DOI: 10.1111/1467-923x.12162
发表时间: 2015
期刊: The Political Quarterly
影响因子: --
作者:
Mcewen N
通讯作者: Mcewen N