High discipline, low cohesion? the uncertain patterns of canadian parliamentary party groups
High discipline, low cohesion? the uncertain patterns of canadian parliamentary party groups
复制标题
纪律性高，凝聚力低？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Malloy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Malloy
加拿大议会党团呈现出一幅纪律和凝聚力参差不齐的图景。加拿大下议院的投票受到政党的严格约束，持不同意见的人比英国少。然而，传统的加拿大政党在意识形态上一直相当不同，凝聚力更多地基于个人关系和忠诚度，而不是共同的意识形态纽带。1993年新政党的到来挑战了这一传统模式，但旧政党和新政党之间的差异更多的是程度而不是性质。本文假设，这些趋势与加拿大政党不断变化的成员基础有关，这往往会加强中央权力。结果是纪律严明、有一定凝聚力的政党，但缺乏意识形态方向或一致性。
Canadian parliamentary party groups present a mixed picture of discipline and cohesion. Canadian House of Commons votes are tightly disciplined by party with less dissent than in Britain. Yet traditional Canadian parties have been quite ideologically heterogeneous, with cohesion based more on personal relationships and loyalties than shared ideological bonds. The arrival of new parties in 1993 has challenged this traditional pattern, but the differences between older and newer parties are more in degree than kind. This article hypothesises that these trends are linked to the fluid membership base of Canadian parties, which tends to reinforce central power. The result is disciplined and somewhat cohesive parties, but with a lack of ideological direction or consistency.