Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar
Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar
复制标题
用制度语法进行制度分析
DOI：
10.1111/psj.12361
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
A. Bennett
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Saba Siddiki;Tanya Heikkila;C. Weible;Raul Pacheco‐Vega;D. P. Carter;Cali Curley;A. Deslatte;A. Bennett
制度是体现在公共政策和/或社会习俗中的战略、规范和规则。它们反映并确立了关于谁能做什么、在哪里以及如何做的期望，并经常被用来解决集体行动困境和其他类型的治理挑战。鉴于其突出性，社会科学学者已经投入了大量的精力来开发分析方法，以了解机构的设计，功能和绩效。特别有价值的是那些可以概括各种机构类型的方法，这些方法的通用性足以与多种概念、理论和方法相结合。本文着重于这样一种方法，称为机构语法。机构语法是一种评估机构结构和内容的方法。它在推出后立即受到有限的关注。然而，近年来，许多期刊文章已经出版，强调制度语法的承诺，支持严格的分析制度设计和相关的结果，在各种理论，概念和方法的背景下。这篇文章（一）重新介绍了部分的制度语法;（二）总结了理论，方法论和经验的焦点，所有期刊发表的文章，以解决它;（三）提出了一个议程，推进研究机构使用制度语法。
Institutions are strategies, norms, and rules embodied in public policies and/or social conventions. They reflect and establish expectations about who can do what, where, and how, and are often employed for resolving collective action dilemmas and other kinds of governance challenges. Given their salience, social science scholars have dedicated substantial effort to developing analytical approaches for understanding the design, function, and performance of institutions. Particularly valuable are approaches that generalize across institutional types and are versatile enough to be paired with multiple concepts, theories, and methods. This paper focuses on one such approach, called the Institutional Grammar. The Institutional Grammar is an approach for assessing the structure and content of institutions. It received limited attention immediately following its introduction. In recent years, however, numerous journal articles have been published that highlight the promise of the Institutional Grammar for supporting rigorous analyses of institutional design and associated outcomes within the context of various theoretical, conceptual, and methodological approaches. This article (i) reintroduces parts of the Institutional Grammar; (ii) summarizes the theoretical, methodological, and empirical foci of all journal articles published to date that address it; and (iii) presents an agenda for advancing the study of institutions using the Institutional Grammar.