VERB-SPECIFIC CONSTRAINTS IN SENTENCE PROCESSING - SEPARATING EFFECTS OF LEXICAL PREFERENCE FROM GARDEN-PATHS
VERB-SPECIFIC CONSTRAINTS IN SENTENCE PROCESSING - SEPARATING EFFECTS OF LEXICAL PREFERENCE FROM GARDEN-PATHS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528
复制
发表时间：
1993-05-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
KELLO, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
TRUESWELL, JC;TANENHAUS, MK;KELLO, C
在跨模式命名实验，自定进度的阅读实验以及一个监测眼睛运动的实验中，发现了动词特异性句法（亚分类）信息的直接影响。在阅读研究中，句子补充中的句法错误分析效应（例如，“学生忘记了解决方案……”）在补语中发生的动词（例如，was）的矩阵动词，通常与名词短语补充一起使用，但不适合通常与句子补充一起使用的动词。此外，对句子汇集偏置动词的互补效应不是归因于句法的误分析，而是与特定动词更喜欢遵循的互补词相关的效果。结果支持立即使用词汇特定约束的模型，尤其是基于约束的模型，但对于词汇过滤模型是有问题的。
Immediate effects of verb-specific syntactic (subcategorization) information were found in a cross-modal naming experiment, a self-paced reading experiment, and an experiment in which eye movements were monitored. In the reading studies, syntactic misanalysis effects in sentence complements (e.g., ''The student forgot the solution was...'') occurred at the verb in the complement (e.g., was) for matrix verbs typically used with noun phrase complements but not for verbs typically used with sentence complements. In addition, a complementizer effect for sentence-complement-biased verbs was not due to syntactic misanalysis but was correlated with how strongly a particular verb prefers to be followed by the complementizer that. The results support models that make immediate use of lexically specific constraints, especially constraint-based models, but are problematic for lexical filtering models.