A Meta-Analysis of Positive and Negative Age Stereotype Priming Effects on Behavior Among Older Adults
A Meta-Analysis of Positive and Negative Age Stereotype Priming Effects on Behavior Among Older Adults
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/geronb/gbr062
复制
发表时间：
2012-01-01
影响因子：
6.2
通讯作者：
Meisner, Brad A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Meisner, Brad A.
有证据表明，年龄刻板印象的影响，在以后的生活中，通过刻板印象效价结果同化的几个行为结果，但是，积极与消极的年龄刻板印象的影响还没有作出直接比较。PsycINFO和Pubmed被用来生成一个列表的文章（n = 137），其中7个是适用的。从这些文章中，平均值，标准误（SE），和其他相关数据提取的52个依赖措施：27涉及负年龄启动和25涉及积极的年龄启动。采用独立样本方差分析方法，以中性参照为对照，研究启动效价和意识对被试行为的影响，发现启动效价的主效应显著，负年龄启动对被试行为的影响大于正年龄启动（F（1，48）= 4.32，p = .04）。事实上，与中性基线相比，负年龄启动的影响几乎是正启动的三倍。这种影响并不受主要意识，学科的研究，研究设计，或research group.Findings结果表明，消极的年龄刻板印象有更强的影响，在老年人的重要行为结果比积极的年龄刻板印象。
Evidence has shown that age stereotypes influence several behavioral outcomes in later life via stereotype valence-outcome assimilation; however, a direct comparison of positive versus negative age stereotyping effects has not yet been made.PsycINFO and Pubmed were used to generate a list of articles (n = 137), of which seven were applicable. From these articles, means, standard errors (SEs), and other relevant data were extracted for 52 dependent measures: 27 involved negative age primes and 25 involved positive age primes. Independent samples analysis of variance tests were used to explore the influence of prime valence and awareness on behavior compared with a neutral referent.A significant main effect for prime valence was found such that negative age priming elicited a greater effect on behavior than did positive age priming (F(1,48) = 4.32, p = .04). In fact, the effects from negative age priming were almost three times larger than those of positive priming when compared with a neutral baseline. This effect was not influenced by prime awareness, discipline of study, study design, or research group.Findings show that negative age stereotyping has a much stronger influence on important behavioral outcomes among older adults than does positive age stereotyping.