Emergence of and Compliance with New Social Norms
Emergence of and Compliance with New Social Norms
复制标题
DOI：
10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0021
复制
发表时间：
2020-08-01
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Diekmann, Andreas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Diekmann, Andreas
在危机情况下，人们必须改变自己的行为。一个集体学习的过程开始了，新的秩序模式出现了。行为的外部性导致新的社会规范的出现。但是，社会规范是否也得到遵守？更仔细的审查必须考虑到社会规范的不同性质。根据Ullmann-Margalit（1977）的理论，协调规范或惯例（刘易斯，1969）对规范导向行为的影响不同于合作规范。这种区分对于立法也很重要。协调规范不存在“搭便车问题”，但合作规范存在“搭便车问题”。本文探讨了在电晕危机期间出现的新规范的特征问题，例如距离要求，戴口罩的义务以及在数字追踪感染链方面的合作。分析导致的条件，可以解释遵守新的社会规范的程度。
In crisis situations, people have to change their behaviour. A collective learning process begins and new patterns of order emerge. Externalities of behaviour lead to the emergence of new social norms. But are the social norms also followed? A closer examination must take into account the different character of social norms. Following the theory of Ullmann-Margalit (1977), coordination norms or conventions (Lewis 1969) have different consequences for norm oriented behaviour than cooperation norms. This distinction is also important for law-making. There is no "free-rider problem" with coordination norms, but there is one with cooperation norms. This paper examines the question of the characteristics of new norms which emerged during the corona crisis, such as the requirement for distance, the obligation to wear masks and cooperation in the digital tracing of infection chains. The analysis leads to conditions which may explain the degree of compliance with new social norms.