To Deaf or not to deaf: That is the Question
To Deaf or not to deaf: That is the Question
复制标题
聋还是不聋：这是一个问题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Clark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kimberly K. Pudans‐Smith;Katrina R. Cue;Ju;M. Clark
名字既有个人的，也有政治的，因为它们与身份有关。伍德沃德在1975年的文章中第一次提到了D/deaf的命名惯例，从那以后，著名的学者就一直在争论这个问题。为了评估当前的偏好，研究小组使用在线问卷收集来自社区的主位见解和意见，以及听力个体对这些问题的工作的更多的主位观点。对这三组自我认定的参与者（聋人、聋人和听力正常者）的数据进行了分析。结果发现高变异性的反应有关的条款，D/聋，以及是否某些条款应保留在词典中。结果进行了讨论，并提出在该领域的贡献和进一步的研究。建议遵守现有术语的用法，并尽可能尊重和使用个人偏好的命名约定。
Names are both personal and political, as they relate to identity. Woodward’s 1975 etic article first mentioned a naming convention for D/deaf and prominent scholars have debated the issue since. To evaluate current preferences, the research team used an online questionnaire to gather emic insights and opinions from the community, as well as a more etic perspective from hearing individuals for work with these issues. Data from these three self-identified groups of participants, Deaf, deaf, and hearing, were analyzed. Results found high variability among responses related to the terms, D/deaf, and whether or not certain terms should remain in the lexicon. Results are discussed and presented both to contribute and to further research in the field. It is recommended that the usage of existing term(s) be adhered to and that an individual’s preferred naming conventions be respected and utilized whenever possible.