PERSONALITY TYPE, SMOKING HABIT AND THEIR INTERACTION AS PREDICTORS OF CANCER AND CORONARY HEART-DISEASE (Publication with Expression of Concern. See vol. 159, 2020)
PERSONALITY TYPE, SMOKING HABIT AND THEIR INTERACTION AS PREDICTORS OF CANCER AND CORONARY HEART-DISEASE (Publication with Expression of Concern. See vol. 159, 2020)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0191-8869(88)90125-0
复制
发表时间：
1988-01-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
VETTER, H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GROSSARTHMATICEK, R;EYSENCK, HJ;VETTER, H
在这次研讨会的第一篇论文中，得出的结论是，有强有力的证据表明，个人性格特征，如绝望/无助，神经质及其正面，即理性反情绪行为，愤怒/觉醒，与癌症和冠心病等疾病之间的关系，另一方面。还有人认为，一个更全面的人格类型概念，无论是癌症倾向还是冠心病倾向，都可能比所讨论的特征的简单组合更具预测性。这里描述了这样一种尝试，给出了关于所讨论的类型的性质的更多细节。这些数据包含在以前的记录中（Eysenck，1987 a，1987 b; Grossarth-Maticek，1986）。这种类型学系统并不要求普遍有效性，但特别适用于预测经历某些类型压力并以某些方式对这种压力作出反应的人的癌症和心血管疾病。因此，重要的是这种压力的发生，以及不同类型对这种压力的特殊反应。首先将简要描述这四种类型，然后是本文报告的三项前瞻性研究中使用的实际问卷。构成该系统基础的压力源于个体未能与情感上高度重要的对象建立积极关系，该对象可以是一个人，具体的职业成功，或生活的特定方面。
In the first paper of this symposium, it was concluded that the evidence was strong concerning the relationship between individual traits of personality, such as hopelessness/helplessness, neuroticism and its obverse, namely rational-antiemotional behaviour, and anger/arousal on the one hand, and diseases like cancer and coronary heart disease, on the other. It was also suggested that a more global concept of personality type, either cancer-prone or coronary heart disease-prone, might be even more predictive than a simple combination of the traits in question. Such an attempt is described here, giving much greater detail about the nature of the types in question than. was contained in previous accounts (Eysenck, 1987a, 1987b; Grossarth-Maticek, 1986). This system of typology does not claim universal validity, but is specifically geared to the prediction of cancer and cardiovascular disease in people who experience certain types of stress and react in certain ways to this stress. As a consequence, it is specifically the occurrence of this stress, and the particular reaction of the different types to this stress, which are important. A brief description of the four types will first be given, followed by the actual questionnaire used in the three prospective studies here reported. The stress which forms the basis of the system arises from the individual’s failure to relate positively to an emotionally highly important object, which could be a person, specific professional success, or a particular aspect of living.