Rumination and age: some things get better.

Rumination and age: some things get better.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1155/2012/267327
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Vögele C
Vögele C
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sütterlin S;Paap MC;Babic S;Kübler A;Vögele C

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

沉思被定义为一种应对痛苦的方式,涉及被动地将注意力集中在痛苦的症状上而不采取行动。这种功能失调的反应方式会加剧抑郁情绪,损害人际问题的解决,并导致对未来的看法更加悲观和社会支持减少。由于这些结果大部分是从年轻人身上获得的,因此年龄如何影响沉思思维仍不清楚。使用反应风格问卷 (RSQ) 向 300 名年龄从 15 岁到 87 岁不等的公众询问了他们的沉思风格、抑郁症和对生活的满意度。莫肯量表分析证实了 RSQ 的双因素结构,其中沉思和反思是沉思的子组成部分。年龄较大的参与者(63 岁及以上)报告的沉思思维少于其他年龄组。生活满意度与沉思有关,并且在本研究调查的早期和最新生命阶段中生活满意度最高。
Rumination has been defined as a mode of responding to distress that involves passively focusing one's attention on symptoms of distress without taking action. This dysfunctional response style intensifies depressed mood, impairs interpersonal problem solving, and leads to more pessimistic future perspectives and less social support. As most of these results were obtained from younger people, it remains unclear how age affects ruminative thinking. Three hundred members of the general public ranging in age from 15 to 87 years were asked about their ruminative styles using the Response Styles Questionnaire (RSQ), depression and satisfaction with life. A Mokken Scale analysis confirmed the two-factor structure of the RSQ with brooding and reflective pondering as subcomponents of rumination. Older participants (63 years and older) reported less ruminative thinking than other age groups. Life satisfaction was associated with brooding and highest for the earlier and latest life stages investigated in this study.