The "private" in the privatisation of schools: the case of Chile
The "private" in the privatisation of schools: the case of Chile
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00131911.2019.1522035
复制
发表时间：
2019-01-02
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Gunter, Helen M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carrasco, Alejandro;Gunter, Helen M.
公共服务教育的私有化是全球教育改革运动（GERM）的一个关键特征，在这场运动中，政策信念、理念和战略是改革“传播和变异”的组成部分。虽然有一些重要的项目试图描述和解释重组、所有权和筹资方面的重大变化，但没有得到足够重视的是私营部门在私有化中的作用。我们所说的私人，指的是（a）个人和家庭以及（B）学校提供者关于教育服务的决定和选择，以及传统上属于公共领域的问题如何得到解决。（例如，通过政府系统，在当地社区/市立学校的议程上）（例如，政府系统已被拆除，由新的供应商取代，当地社区/市政学校要么不复存在，要么为那些在市场上失败的人提供“安全网”）。我们打算关注的是去政治化的私人主义，私人在学校的供应和需求中的作用，说明了教育问题的识别和解决从政治化的公众到去政治化的私人领域的转变。我们报告具体的知识和经验工作，关于如何在智利提供教育服务的供应和需求的作品，特别是通过看那些谁拥有和在学校工作的人如何看待当前的改革。
Privatisation of public services education is a key feature of the Global Education Reform Movement (GERM), where policy convictions, ideas, and strategies are integral to the "spreading and mutating" of reforms. While there are important projects that seek to describe and explain major changes to restructuring, ownership and funding, what has not been given sufficient attention is the role of the private in privatisation. By private, we mean the decisions and choices regarding educational services of (a) individuals and families and (b) school providers, and how issues that have traditionally been in the public domain (e.g. through government systems, on the agendas of local community/municipal schools) are no longer there (e.g. government systems have been dismantled and replaced with new providers, and local community/municipal schools either no longer exist or provide "safety nets" for those who fail in the market). What we intend focusing on is depoliticised privatism, where the role of the private in the supply and demand for school places illuminates a shift in the identification and addressing of educational matters from the politicised public to the depoliticised private domain. We report specifically on intellectual and empirical work regarding how supply and demand works in the provision of education services in Chile, particularly by looking at how those who own and work in schools view current reforms.