The Nature-Nurture Debate is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity.
The Nature-Nurture Debate is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity.
复制标题
先天与后天的争论结束了，双方都输了！
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01443.x
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Ellison,ChristopherG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bradshaw,Matt;Ellison,ChristopherG
在关于生理倾向或性别角色社会化差异的争论中，过于强调非此即彼的二分法。我们认为，女性较高的宗教信仰可能是生物和环境影响的产物，通过讨论：(1)先天与后天的谬论；(2)生物学对宗教结果的影响；(3)生物因素对宗教参与的影响；(4)社会科学中的因果关系和混淆；(5)生物与环境相互作用的跨学科模型。
In the debate about biological dispositions or differential sex‐role socialization, too much emphasis is given to an either‐ or dichotomy. We argue that the higher religiosity of women is likely the product of both biological and environmental influences by discussing: (1) the fallacy of nature “versus” nurture; (2) biological influences on religious outcomes; (3) biological influences on the predictors of religious involvement; (4) causality and confounding in social science; and (5) interdisciplinary models of biology‐environment interplay.