The knowledge behind Brexit. A bibliographic analysis of ex-ante policy appraisals on Brexit in the United Kingdom and the European Union
The knowledge behind Brexit. A bibliographic analysis of ex-ante policy appraisals on Brexit in the United Kingdom and the European Union
复制标题
英国脱欧背后的知识。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Julianne De Leeuwe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Pattyn;Athanassios Gouglas;Julianne De Leeuwe
摘要在本文中，我们绘制并解释了85个英国脱欧影响评估引用的知识来源，其中46个是由欧洲议会下令并发布的正式影响评估，39个由英国政府下令并由下议院退出欧盟委员会发布的“部门报告”。所有报告都是在英国公投后的第二天和英国-欧盟谈判开始后的第二年之间发布的。我们对3537篇参考文献进行了引文分析，并使用非参数检验检验了作者推动和政策部门拉动假设。我们的研究结果突出了作者所属的专业指称群体的认知功能。作者倾向于生成信息并引用与他们工作的部门单位或更大的专业团体中的“家庭团体”一致的来源，即使在英国脱欧等紧急高风险情况下也是如此。政策部门之间的差异并不重要。
ABSTRACT In this article we map and explain the sources of knowledge cited on 85 Brexit impact appraisals, 46 of which were formal impact assessments ordered and published by the European Parliament and 39 ‘sectoral reports’ ordered by the UK Government and released by the House of Commons Exiting the EU Committee. All reports were published between the day after the UK referendum and the year after the start of the UK-EU negotiations. We conducted a citation analysis of 3537 references and tested author push and policy sector pull hypotheses with non-parametric tests. Our findings highlight the epistemic function of the professional referent groups to which authors belong. Authors tend to generate information and cite sources that are congruent with their ‘home group’ in the departmental unit where they work, or their larger professional group, even in urgent high-salient risk situations like Brexit. Differences between policy sectors do not strongly matter.