THE ASSOCIATIVE-PROPOSITIONAL EVALUATION MODEL: THEORY, EVIDENCE, AND OPEN QUESTIONS
THE ASSOCIATIVE-PROPOSITIONAL EVALUATION MODEL: THEORY, EVIDENCE, AND OPEN QUESTIONS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/b978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bodenhausen, Galen V.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gawronski, Bertram;Bodenhausen, Galen V.
当代心理学的一个中心主题是内隐评价和外显评价的区别。研究表明，两种评价之间存在着不同的解离，包括不同的前因、不同的结果以及对同一对象的不同评价。联想-命题评价（APE）模型通过将内隐和外显评价概念化为两个定性不同过程的结果来解释这些分离。内隐评价被描述为联想过程的结果，而外显评价则代表命题过程的结果。联想过程被进一步定义为基于特征相似性和时空连续性的心理联想的激活；命题过程被定义为在逻辑一致性的基础上对激活信息的验证。APE模型包括关于联想过程和命题过程之间相互作用的具体假设，这意味着对内隐和外显评估的对称和非对称变化的广泛预测。本章回顾了APE模型的概念和经验假设以及支持其预测的证据。此外，我们还讨论了APE模型在概念上和实证上面临的挑战，以及未来内隐和外显评价研究的各个方向。
A central theme in contemporary psychology is the distinction between implicit and explicit evaluations. Research has shown various dissociations between the two kinds of evaluations, including different antecedents, different consequences, and discrepant evaluations of the same object. The associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model accounts for these dissociations by conceptualizing implicit and explicit evaluations as the outcomes of two qualitatively distinct processes. Whereas implicit evaluations are described as the outcome of associative processes, explicit evaluations represent the outcome of propositional processes. Associative processes are further specified as the activation of mental associations on the basis of feature similarity and spatiotemporal contiguity; propositional processes are defined as the validation of activated information on the basis of logical consistency. The APE model includes specific assumptions about the mutual interplay between associative and propositional processes, implying a wide range of predictions about symmetric and asymmetric changes in implicit and explicit evaluations. The current chapter reviews the conceptual and empirical assumptions of the APE model and evidence in support of its predictions. In addition, we discuss conceptual and empirical challenges for the APE model and various directions for future research on implicit and explicit evaluation.