Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies?
Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00074-9
复制
发表时间：
2002-05-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Rosa, E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Perea, M;Rosa, E
许多实验表明，当启动和目标之间的刺激起始时间（SOA）较长（超过400 ms）时，当列表中有高比例的关联相关对时，关联启动效应的幅度会大幅增加。在目前的一系列实验中，我们操纵的比例关联相关的对时，SOA是非常短暂的（小于200毫秒）。如果一个目标词的处理是自动促进了先前的介绍相关的启动，启动的发生应不受相关对列表中的比例。实验1在双词汇判断任务中发现了显著的关联比例效应。实验24采用掩蔽启动技术，在几个非常短的SOA（66，116，166 ms）的词汇决策和命名。结果表明，在两种任务中均存在可靠的联想启动效应。这并没有作为相关对的比例的函数而不同。最后，实验5使用未掩蔽的素数在83毫秒的SOA中，素数保持在目标介绍后的看法。在实验2-4中，关联效应不调制的比例关联相关的对。这些结果的影响进行了讨论。(C)2002 Elsevier Science B. V.保留所有权利。
A number of experiments have shown that the magnitude of the associative priming effect increases substantially when there is a high proportion of associatively related pairs in the list when the stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) between prime and target is long (more than 400 ms). In the present series of experiments we manipulated the proportion of associatively related pairs when the SOA was very brief (less than 200 ms). If processing of a target word is facilitated automatically by the prior presentation of a related prime, the occurrence of priming should be unaffected by the proportion of related pairs in the list. Experiment 1 showed a robust relatedness proportion effect obtained in a double lexical decision task. Experiments 24 used the masked priming technique at several very short SOAs (66, 116, and 166 ms) in lexical decision and naming. The results showed a reliable associative priming effect in the two tasks. which did not differ as a function of the proportion of related pairs. Finally, Experiment 5 used unmasked primes at an 83-ms SOA in which the primes remained in view after the target presentation. As in Experiments 2-4, the associative effect was not modulated by the proportion of associatively related pairs. The implications of these results are discussed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.