Reframing the evidence base for policy-relevance to increase impact: a case study on forest fragmentation in the oil palm sector
Reframing the evidence base for policy-relevance to increase impact: a case study on forest fragmentation in the oil palm sector
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1365-2664.12845
复制
发表时间：
2017-06-01
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
Hill, Jane K.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lucey, Jennifer M.;Palmer, Georgina;Hill, Jane K.
1.有必要改善科学家和决策者之间的知识交流，以便能够随时获取科学证据，为决策者提供信息。为了最大限度地发挥科学证据在政策制定中的影响，科学界应更充分地与决策者接触，建立长期的工作关系，以确定和应对“政策窗口”，重新构建与政策相关的科学。我们使用一个案例研究来说明这个过程和挑战，在这个案例研究中，我们综合了栖息地破碎化研究的证据，为改善油棕行业的生物多样性保护提供信息，从而将这项研究纳入新的行业指南。政策影响。案例研究表明，如何有一个深入的了解“政策竞技场”（国家的政策和行为者和影响因素，影响政策），并与相关的和具体的信息作出回应，使有效地吸收科学，为设计保护设置在油棕产业。
1. It is necessary to improve knowledge exchange between scientists and decision-makers so that scientific evidence can be readily accessed to inform policy.2. To maximise impact of scientific evidence in policy development, the scientific community should engage more fully with decision-makers, building long-term working relationships in order to identify and respond to 'policy windows' with science that is reframed for policy-relevance.3. We illustrate the process and challenges using a case study in which we synthesised evidence from studies of habitat fragmentation to provide information for improved biodiversity conservation in the oil palm sector, resulting in the uptake of this research into new industry guidelines.4. Policy implications. The case study demonstrates how having an in-depth understanding of the 'policy arena' (the state of policy and the actors and influencing factors that affect policy) and responding with relevant and specific information, enabled effective uptake of science to inform the design of conservation set-asides in the oil palm industry.