Response to "Emerging Roles of Virtual Patients in the Age of AI".
Response to "Emerging Roles of Virtual Patients in the Age of AI".
复制标题
对“人工智能时代虚拟患者的新兴角色”的回应。
DOI:
10.1001/amajethics.2019.920
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Fetters,MichaelD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kron,FrederickW;Guetterman,TimothyC;Fetters,MichaelD
1. Conflation of virtual patients and virtual humans. The term virtual patient (VP) has been applied to numerous applications with different designs, technologies, and educational objectives. This heterogeneity can lead to confusion. 1 The Association of American Medical Colleges’ definition of VP that the authors reference was developed in 2006 and refers to computerized clinical case simulations. 2 These applications, which are largely text based with multimedia content, focus on clinical reasoning and decision making and do not utilize AI. 1, 3, 4 The authors conflate VPs of this type with virtual humans (VHs), computerdriven conversational agents with human form that interact with humans using the full range of behaviors found in human-to-human, face-to-face interaction. 5 VHs utilize AI in computer-based interpersonal communication training simulations—as virtual standardized patients, 4, 6 physicians, or any other human across the health care enterprise.2. Overstatement of virtual patient perils. The authors present material about “sexist AI,” cybercrime, malicious intent in programming, and psychopathic AI. Without an accompanying account of educational software, AI, or VH development, readers may overestimate the risk of using these agents. The following clarification should mitigate the sense of menace the article evokes.