Help-seeking among lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or transgender victims/survivors of domestic violence and abuse: The impacts of cisgendered heteronormativity and invisibility

Help-seeking among lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or transgender victims/survivors of domestic violence and abuse: The impacts of cisgendered heteronormativity and invisibility
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1440783319882088
复制
发表时间:
2019-11-11
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Barnes, Rebecca
Barnes, Rebecca
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Donovan, Catherine;Barnes, Rebecca

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管对女同性恋,同性恋,双性恋和/或跨性别(LGB和/或T)人际关系的家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)的研究越来越多,但LGB和/或T人在DVA政策和实践中仍然在很大程度上看不见。研究证据表明,他们主要是向辅导员/治疗师和朋友等私有化来源寻求帮助。关于LGB和/或T受害者/幸存者寻求帮助的知识的差距反映了新自由主义趋势在私有化社会问题方面的成功,通过促进自我保健和个人责任。使用来自英国混合方法的定性数据,本文提供了LGB和/或T受害者/幸存者寻求帮助的决策和障碍的生态分析,以表明如何对个人,人际,人际关系和人际关系,人际关系和人际关系和人际,人际关系和人际渗透性寻求帮助。社会文化层面。结论认为,LGBT DVA被认为是社会问题,而不是私人问题。为更好地识别和支持LGB和/或T受害者/幸存者提供必要步骤提供建议。
Despite growing research into domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or trans (LGB and/or T) people's relationships, LGB and/or T people remain largely invisible in DVA policy and practice. Research evidence indicates that they primarily seek help from privatised sources such as counsellors/therapists and friends. The gap in knowledge about LGB and/or T victims/survivors' help-seeking reflects and reinforces the success of neoliberal trends in privatising social problems by promoting self-care and individual responsibility. Using qualitative data from a mixed-methods UK study, this article offers an ecological analysis of LGB and/or T victims/survivors' help-seeking decisions and barriers, demonstrating how cisgendered heteronormativity and LGBT invisibility permeate help-seeking at individual, interpersonal and socio-cultural levels. The conclusion argues for LGBT DVA to be recognised as a social problem rather than a private trouble. Recommendations are offered for necessary steps towards better recognising and supporting LGB and/or T victims/survivors.