ACC/AHA/HRS 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (ACC/AHA/HRS Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Electrophysiology)
ACC/AHA/HRS 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (ACC/AHA/HRS Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Electrophysiology)
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.020
复制
发表时间:
2006-12-05
影响因子:
24
通讯作者:
Redberg, Rita F.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Buxton, Alfred E.;Calkins, Hugh;Redberg, Rita F.
The current era of clinical cardiac electrophysiology (EP) began in the late 1960s with the introduction and growth of EP laboratories. What began as a diagnostic field focused on improving our understanding of cardiac conduction defects, then spread into diagnostic studies of patients with tachyarrhythmias, both supraventricular and ventricular. This discipline has now evolved into one in which therapeutic ventures have displaced diagnosis as the major focus. Therapies directed by electrophysiologists encompass two major types: 1) catheter-based, for cure or palliation of tachyarrhythmias; and 2) device-based, for both bradyarrhythmias as well as tachyarrhythmias. More recently, EP has influenced the treatment of patients with heart failure, using unique pacing modalities. This discipline will continue to evolve, and one can foresee EP catheters and devices being utilized to deliver novel molecular and genetic therapies in the future.Increasing emphasis is being placed on the outcomes of treatment. If we are to evaluate the results of new, as well as established, treatments, it is necessary to characterize patients accurately. This, in turn, requires the creation of databases that not only record patient attributes, but permit comparison between patient groups. Description of patient characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes, is vital not only to researchers, but to practitioners. Every physician involved in patient care is obligated to critically evaluate the results of the care they deliver. If we do not question the results of our interactions with patients, we will perpetuate misconceptions, repeat previous mistakes, and retard the advancement of medical science. It is in this spirit that we present this first edition of the ACC/AHA/HRS Electrophysiology Clinical Data Standards.