From Compassionate Ageism to Intergenerational Conflict?
From Compassionate Ageism to Intergenerational Conflict?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/geront/gnq056
复制
发表时间：
2010-10-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
Binstock, Robert H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Binstock, Robert H.
在《老年学家》出版的50年里，美国的老龄化政治发生了明显的变化。老年人的政治行为在很大程度上保持不变，尽管不同的出生群体在老年人的行列中相互继承。但是，老龄化政策的政治--活跃在这一竞技场的有组织的利益和倡导团体，关于老年人是老龄化政策受益者的公共话语的基调，关于公共老年福利的国家政治议程，以及更广泛的美国社会政策，都对老龄化政策的发展产生了影响。S.政治经济在这50年里发生了巨大的变化。现在，在婴儿潮老龄化和对减少巨额联邦财政赤字（年度和累计）的担忧的背景下，美国的政治。S.老龄化政策可能与昨天和今天有很大不同。未来是否有可能在主要老年福利计划的税收和支出问题上发生代际政治冲突？如果是这样，什么可以防止或减轻它？
During the 50 years in which The Gerontologist has been publishing, the politics of aging in the United States has undergone distinct changes. The political behavior of older individuals has remained largely the same even though different birth cohorts have succeeded each other in populating the ranks of older people. But the politics of policies on aging-the organized interest and advocacy groups active in this arena, the tenor of public discourse about older people as beneficiaries of policies on aging, the national political agendas regarding public old-age benefits, and the broader U. S. political economy-have changed substantially over these five decades. Now, in the contexts of the aging of the baby boom and concerns about reducing large federal fiscal deficits (annual and cumulative), the politics of U. S. policies on aging may change considerably from those of yesterday and today. Is there a possibility of future intergenerational political conflict over taxes and expenditures for the major old-age benefit programs? If so, what might prevent or mitigate it?