On the Misapplication of the BAPQ in a Study of Autism
On the Misapplication of the BAPQ in a Study of Autism
复制标题
BAPQ 在自闭症研究中的误用
DOI:
10.1007/s10803-014-2077-y
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Stephen M. Kanne
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takeshi Nishiyama;Stephen M. Kanne
We begin with thanking the authors for their insightful critiques. We agree with the author that the Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire (BAPQ)(Hurley et al. 2007) was not developed to be administered to individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). As a matter of note, the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and Social Responsiveness Scale2-Adult Self report (SRS2-AS) were developed to measure a wide range of quantitative autistic traits (QATs), including those found in ASD, though the Subthreshold Autism Trait Questionnaire (SATQ)(Kanne et al. 2012) also purports to assess subthreshold ASD traits in a general population, but not in the ASD subjects alone. We used the ASD sample to assess construct validity of these questionnaires. From theoretical and empirical consideration (Kanne et al. 2012), a questionnaire measuring QATs is expected to be associated with case–control status. That is, the higher one’s score, the more likely he/she is an ASD case. In our study, the ability of the questionnaire to identify such association was used as an index of construct validity.The authors stated ‘‘the constructs underlying the BAP and ASD differ substantially’’and described an example,‘‘a father who prefers to go to the same restaurant every Saturday night’’, which differs vastly from a repetitive and stereotyped behavior (RRB) such as echolalia. However, inspection of the item contents in the other three QAT