Vocatives and Other Direct Address Forms: A Contrastive Study
Vocatives and Other Direct Address Forms: A Contrastive Study
复制标题
呼格和其他直接称呼形式：对比研究
DOI：
10.5617/osla.68
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Parrott
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Parrott
在本文中，我分析了俄罗斯的直接称呼形式，无论是不同的截断呼格和主格直接称呼形式。我对比的形式和功能的限制，截断呼格与其他语言（如捷克语和波兰语）的呼格，我比较插入俄语直接称呼形式的话语，在英语中的情况。俄语直接称呼语在形式和用法上与其他语言有相似之处，但英语中的韵律和句法限制比俄语强得多，这意味着俄语直接称呼语的标点功能比英语灵活得多。
In this paper I analyze Russian direct address forms, both the distinct truncated vocative and nominative-case direct address forms. I contrast the formal and functional restrictions on the truncated vocative with vocatives in other languages (e.g. Czech and Polish), and I compare the interpolation of Russian direct address forms in an utterance to the situation in English. While similarities are found both in the form and the usage of Russian direct address forms with those in other languages, the prosodic and syntactic constraints in English are considerably stronger than in Russian, which means that the punctuating function of direct address forms is considerably more flexible in Russian than in English.