Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations.

Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037//0022-3514.64.5.779
复制
发表时间:
1993-05
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
M. Hewstone;Mir Rabiul Islam;C. Judd
M. Hewstone;Mir Rabiul Islam;C. Judd
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Hewstone;Mir Rabiul Islam;C. Judd

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

两项研究探索了6种交叉分类模式。在实验1中,孟加拉国的穆斯林(多数)和印度教徒(少数)评估了通过跨宗教(印度教或穆斯林)和国籍(孟加拉人或印度人)创建的4个目标群体中的一个,然后对目标群体的感知变异性进行了评级。实验2是研究的延伸,包括新的措施。这两项研究都显示了宗教和民族的加性效应,如3个模型所预测的那样,宗教的类别优势效应很强,只有当宗教的内部群体是其所在国家的主导和多数群体时,群体外同质性才会出现。实验二还表明,基于宗教和自尊的歧视与对等级排序模型的边际支持之间存在显著的关系。讨论了交叉分类的具体模式何时以及如何在不同的组间环境中运行。
Two studies explored 6 models of crossed categorization. In Experiment 1, Muslims (majority) and Hindus (minority) in Bangladesh evaluated 1 of 4 target groups created by crossing religion (Hindu or Muslim) and nationality (Bangladeshi or Indian) and then rated the target group's perceived variability. Experiment 2 was an extension of the research, including new measures. Both studies showed additive effects of religion and nationality, as predicted by 3 models, a strong effect of category dominance for religion, and out-group homogeneity only when the religious in-group was the dominant and majority group in its country. Experiment 2 also showed a significant relationship between discrimination based on religion and self-esteem and marginal support for the hierarchical ordering model. When and how specific models of crossed categorization might operate in different intergroup contexts are discussed.