A comparison of four methods for bubble size and void fraction measurements
A comparison of four methods for bubble size and void fraction measurements
复制标题
DOI:
10.1109/48.701193
复制
发表时间:
1998-07-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Farmer, DM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vagle, S;Farmer, DM
We compare the performance of four different bubble-sensing techniques in a range of environments from the surf zone to the open ocean: a remote sensing method using high-frequency backscatter, two in situ methods using an acoustical resonator and a pulse propagation sensor, and a bulk method using electrical conductivity. Comparisons between the techniques show general consistency within the appropriate operational bubble density ranges, although spatial variability in bubble clouds introduces substantial variance. Each technique has its strengths and limitations. Our acoustical resonator is suitable for bubble concentrations with air fractions greater than approximately 10(-9) and the pulse propagation sonar for air fractions from 10(-6); the upper limit for both is constrained by attenuation and the validity of the Foldy scattering approximation. Both sensors can be implemented to encompass a wide frequency range with high resolution, corresponding to resonant bubble radii of 10 similar to 1200 mu m. Far air fractions higher than similar to 5x10(-4), bulk measurement using electrical conductivity provides a measure of air fraction. Sufficient overlap in operational air-fraction range exists between in situ acoustical techniques and conductivity measurement to permit comparison and demonstrate consistency in the measurement, Single- and multifrequency backscatter sonars may be used for low air fractions (