Marine Algae from the Tropical Atlantic Ocean, V: Algae from the Lesser Antilles
Marine Algae from the Tropical Atlantic Ocean, V: Algae from the Lesser Antilles
复制标题
来自热带大西洋的海藻，V：来自小安的列斯群岛的藻类
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1962
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
W. Taylor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Taylor
在准备西印度群岛和邻近海岸的海藻的概述时，作者曾多次注意到明显的不连续性，或者明显的藻类范围远不如预期的那样广泛。一个了解西印度群岛藻类植物群的人会很好地低估这些欺骗性的范围，但仍然局限于他能引用的物种范围。在西印度群岛或其附近，很少有地方的藻类被彻底研究过;即使是那些已经去过的地方和对藻类进行过表面研究的地方，也是广泛分布的。维尔京群岛（当时还是丹麦西印度群岛）的海藻被B rgesen（1913- 1920）彻底研究和描述过，他的论文是有关西印度群岛海藻的论文中信息量最大的。在小安的列斯群岛的藻类著作中，著名的是根据A。Schramm和H.迷宫在瓜德罗普岛（Schrsmm和迷宫1865年，1866年;迷宫和Schramm 1870-77年），鉴定已由兄弟Crouan，著名的植物学家布雷斯特。这些书都是原版的珍本。这些标本的采集具有很强的辨别力，但鉴定时很少考虑到这些植物的巨大变异性，出版物虽然提出了许多新物种，但很少提供对这些植物的描述。似乎没有确定的一套标本被搁置;几个机构拥有相当多的系列，但在给定的收集编号下的标本并不总是相同的物种。哈默尔和哈默尔... Joukov补充这些作品后（1929年，1931年），因为没有Questel（1951年）。格里夫给出了多米尼加藻类的简要清单（1909年）。马提尼克岛的藻类经常被收集，但只有零星的记录。对巴巴多斯藻类的研究（Vickers 1905，1908）产生了一个相当有限的列表和一个漂亮的地图集，其中选择了绿藻和褐藻。作者曾在几篇论文（1929年，1940年，1942年）中报告了小安的列斯群岛的小型收藏品。列出
In preparing a general account of the marine algae of the West Indies and neighboring coasts the writer has had many occasions to note apparent discontinuities of range, or ranges of conspicuous algae much less extensive that it seems reasonable to expect. One who knows the West Indian algal flora well discounts these deceptive ranges, but is nevertheless restricted in the range he can cite for species. The algae of very few places in the West Indies or nearby have been thoroughly studied; even those places that have been visited and the algae superficially studied are widely scattered. The marine algae of the Virgin Islands (while still the Danish West Indics) were thoroughly studied and described by B~rgesen (1913-20), and his papers are the most informative of any dealing with West Indian algae. Famous among the algal works on the Lesser Antilles are the books based on the collections of A. Schramm and H. Maze in Guadeloupe (Schrsmm and Maze 1865, 1866; Maze and Schramm 1870-77), the identifications having been made by the brothers Crouan, well-known phycologists of Brest. These are rare books in the original issues. The collections were made with great discernment, but the identifications took little account of the great variability of many of these plants, and the publications while proposing scores of new species seldom provided descriptions of the plants. It appears that no definitive set of specimens was set aside; several institutions possess considerable series of them but the specimens under a given collection number are not always identical as to species. Hamel and Hamel..Joukov supplemented these works later (1929, 1931), as did Questel (1951). Grieve gave a brief list of Dominican algae (1909). The algae of Martinique have often been collected but reported only in scattered notes. A study of the algae of Barbados (Vickers 1905, 1908) yielded a rather limited list and a handsome atlas of selected Chlorophyceae and Phaeophyceae. The writer has reported on small collections from the Lesser Antilles in a few papers (1929, 1940, 1942). Lists