The Geometer’s Sketchpad Version 2.0

The Geometer’s Sketchpad Version 2.0
复制标题

几何画板2.0版

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Olive
J. Olive
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Olive

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

此修改向 EndNote 传达了这样的信息:参考文献后应留有一个空行,并且应打印摘要字段的内容。手册中注明了 EndNote 的一些限制。例如,当没有列出作者时,它无法正确重新排列字段;它不能自动更改“Ed”。到“编辑”。对于有多个编辑的作品;在文本引用中,当引用同一作者的多篇作品时,它无法自动删除作者姓名。缺少拼写检查功能有些不便。然而,我发现使用EndNote的许多优点远远超过了它的局限性。在我看来,EndNote 是一个易于理解的写作工具,可以增强书面材料的呈现。
This modification communicates to EndNote that a blank line should be left after the reference and the contents of the Abstract field should be printed. Some of EndNote’s limitations are noted in the manual. For example, it cannot properly rearrange fields when no author is listed; it cannot automatically change “Ed.” to “Eds.” for works with more than one editor; in text citations, it cannot automatically remove the author name when more than one work by the same author is cited. The lack of a spell check feature is somewhat of an inconvenience. However, I have found that the many advantages of using EndNote far outweigh its limitations. In my opinion, EndNote is an easily understood writer’s tool that can enhance the presentation of written material.