Self-regulation and the state in industrial relations in Southern Europe: Back to the future?
Self-regulation and the state in industrial relations in Southern Europe: Back to the future?
复制标题
南欧的自我监管和劳资关系状况：回到未来？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
O. Molina
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O. Molina
本文分析了三个南欧国家中国家在劳资关系中的作用以及集体谈判自主权的发展。出发点是矛盾力量对变化方向的影响。尽管存在着减少国家对工作条件和集体谈判的监管的巨大压力，但货币联盟的宏观经济框架对这些经济体提出了新的协调要求。 20世纪90年代和2000年代的社会契约提供了国家协调治理的机制，同时有助于加强谈判的自我监管。尽管如此，在自主集体谈判的范围和形式及其结果方面仍然存在显着的跨国差异。这些国家的社会伙伴面临的结构性挑战，加上对振兴制度战略的重视，使他们在公司和国家层面都处于弱势地位，无法应对危机带来的挑战。因此，最近的事态发展显示出单方面国家干预增加的明显模式，这引发了有关谈判自主权的未来和工会作用的重要问题。
This article analyses the role of the state in industrial relations and the development of collective bargaining autonomy in three Southern European countries. The starting point is the impact of contradictory forces on the direction of change. While there are strong pressures towards less state regulation of working conditions and collective bargaining, the macroeconomic framework of monetary union imposed new coordination requirements upon these economies. Social pacts in the 1990s and 2000s provided a mechanism of state-coordinated governance while at the same time helping to enhance negotiated self-regulation. Nonetheless, significant cross-national differences remained in the extent and form of autonomous collective bargaining and in its outcomes. The structural challenges facing social partners in these countries, together with an emphasis on institutional strategies of revitalization, left them in a weak position at both company and national levels to face the challenges brought on by the crisis. Thus recent developments show a clear pattern of increased unilateral state interference, which raises important questions regarding the future of bargaining autonomy and the role of trade unions.