Negative cognitive styles, dysfunctional attitudes, and the remitted depression paradigm: A search for the elusive cognitive vulnerability to depression factor among remitted depressives

Negative cognitive styles, dysfunctional attitudes, and the remitted depression paradigm: A search for the elusive cognitive vulnerability to depression factor among remitted depressives
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.343
复制
发表时间:
2005-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Hankin, BL
Hankin, BL
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Haeffel, GJ;Abramson, LY;Hankin, BL

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

使用行为高风险设计和近似设计的研究结果通常证实了抑郁症的认知脆弱性假设,而缓解抑郁症研究的结果通常没有。作者怀疑以前进行的缓解设计的设计特征可能使他们无法检测出适应不良的认知模式,因此进行了一项研究,该研究以缓解设计为特色,在抑郁症的生物学脆弱性研究中取得了成功。参与者目前的抑郁症状,消极的认知方式(绝望理论),功能失调的态度(贝克的理论),和临床显着抑郁症的终身患病率进行了评估。与从未患过抑郁症的人相比,从临床上显著的抑郁症发作中缓解的参与者有更多的消极认知方式,但没有更高水平的功能失调态度。
Results from studies using a behavioral high-risk design and approximations to it generally have corroborated the cognitive vulnerability hypothesis of depression, whereas results from remitted depression studies typically have not. Suspecting that design features of previously conducted remitted designs likely precluded them from detecting maladaptive cognitive patterns, the authors conducted a study featuring the remitted design that has been successful in studies of a biological vulnerability for depression. Participants' current depressive symptoms, negative cognitive styles (hopelessness theory), dysfunctional attitudes (Beck's theory), and lifetime prevalence of clinically significant depression were assessed. Participants who had remitted from an episode of clinically significant depression had more negative cognitive styles, but not greater levels of dysfunctional attitudes, than did never depressed individuals.