Productivity losses without absence: measurement validation and empirical evidence
Productivity losses without absence: measurement validation and empirical evidence
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00028-7
复制
发表时间：
1999-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Rutten, FFH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brouwer, WBF;Koopmanschap, MA;Rutten, FFH
在没有缺席的情况下，生产率损失在文献中很少讨论。本文考察了三种不同的生产率损失测量工具的结构效度。这些数据是在一家荷兰贸易公司的员工名下收集的，而不是在特定的患者群体中收集的。平均每天有超过7%的受访者有健康问题，这表明在没有缺勤的情况下工作效率下降是一个相当常见的问题。与这些健康问题相关的生产损失金额相对较小。然而，对于特定的患者群体，与这些生产力损失相关的成本可能是巨大的。(C)1999爱思唯尔爱尔兰科学有限公司。保留所有权利。
Productivity losses without absence are scarcely discussed in the literature. In this paper, the construct validity of three different measurement instruments for productivity losses without absence is investigated. The data were collected under employees of a Dutch trade firm, not in specific patient groups. On an average day, over 7% of the respondents were working with health problems, indicating that productivity losses without absence is quite a common problem. The amount of production losses related to these health problems are relatively small. However, for specific patient groups, the costs related to these productivity losses may be substantial. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.