History, pastness and the postgenomic imaginary.
History, pastness and the postgenomic imaginary.
复制标题
历史、过去和后基因组想象。
DOI：
10.1136/medhum-2020-011948
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
De Groot J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Groot J
这篇文章考虑了诗人、说唱歌手和艺术家，包括Kendrick Lamar、Residente、Zaffar Kunial、Michael Symons Roberts、Hannah Sullivan和Marc Quinn对生物医学后基因组关注的回应方式，以及他们反对或建立这种看似新的人类概念的方式。这些诗人和说唱歌手思考以后基因组方式想象意味着什么，以及这对写作、艺术和生活的可能影响。我探索并阐明了后基因组身份是如何被扩展、理解和想象的。因此，他们参与了Jenny Reardon所阐述的“后基因组状况”的考虑，但正如我所说，他们扩展并辩论了这个问题。这些文本询问了后基因组条件在美学上能够实现什么，更重要的是，可以发展哪种类型的批评。他们看到了扩展、发展、创新和批判的机会，而不是被后基因组化所束缚。在这些表述中，我们可以辨别出后基因组学的路线图，因为诗歌似乎为驾驭这种新状态的复杂性提供了一种深思熟虑的方式。
This article considers the ways that poets, rappers and artists including Kendrick Lamar, Residente, Zaffar Kunial, Michael Symons Roberts, Hannah Sullivan and Marc Quinn have responded to the biomedical postgenomic gaze and the ways in which they have dissented or built on this seemingly new way of conceiving of the human. These poets and rappers consider what it means to imagine in a postgenomic way and the possible implications of this for writing, art and living. The multiple texts I explore and articulate how postgenomic identities have been expanded and understood and imagined. They participate, therefore, in the consideration articulated by Jenny Reardon of the ‘postgenomic condition’ but, as I argue, they extend and debate this. These texts interrogate what the postgenomic condition enables aesthetically and, more importantly, what type of critique might be developed. Rather than be constrained by being postgenomic, they see opportunity for expansion, development, innovation and critique. In these articulations, then, we can discern a roadmap for being postgenomic, as poetry seems to offer a thoughtful means for navigating the complexity of this new state.