THE RENT GAP REEXAMINED

THE RENT GAP REEXAMINED
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/00420989550012366
复制
发表时间:
1995-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
CLARK, E
CLARK, E
中科院分区:
经济学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
CLARK, E

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

鉴于布拉萨最近的批评,租金差距理论被重新审视。这种批评被发现在三个方面存在缺陷:它将抽象概念(实际地租)与具体事件(合同地租)等同起来;它寻求重建时租金差距的相关性;它将租金差距理论简化为计算再开发盈利能力的方程式。本次复审认为:(一)实际土地租金与合同租金不相等的; (2) 租金差距的显着性在重建之前持续较长时间; (3)租金差距理论不应被简化为房地产核算中的盈亏平衡点。它是一种城市规模发展不平衡的政治经济理论,因此不能脱离建筑环境中价值创造和获取所涉及的社会关系和权力斗争。
Rent gap theory is re-examined in view of Bourassa's recent critique. The critique is found to be flawed on three accounts, It equates an abstract concept (actual land rent) with a concrete event (contract rent); it seeks the relevance of the rent gap at times of redevelopment; and it diminishes rent gap theory to an equation for calculating the profitability of redevelopment. In this re-examination, it is argued that: (1) actual land rent is not equal to contract rent; (2) the significance of the rent gap extends over a longer period prior to redevelopment; and (3) rent gap theory should not be reduced to a break-even point in real estate accounting, It is a political economic theory of uneven development on the urban scale and as such cannot be divorced from the societal relations and power struggles involved in the creation and capture of values in the built environment.