On being insecure about the assessment of attachment styles
On being insecure about the assessment of attachment styles
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0265407502196005
复制
发表时间：
2002-12-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Kurdek, LA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kurdek, LA
采用柯林斯和里德（1990）的成人依恋量表（AAS，N = 61对男同性恋，42对女同性恋，155对异性恋夫妇）和Griffin和Bartholomew（1994 b）的关系量表问卷（RSQ，N = 33对男同性恋，52对女同性恋，79对异性恋夫妇），对各分量表的心理测量学特性进行了检验。类型的夫妇没有缓和任何结果。依赖性和亲密度成为AAS的可靠因素，但是，在控制大五人格因素的情况下，两种依恋风格都不能解释关系满意度的独特变化，只有亲密度才能解释关系承诺的独特变化。亲密度通过表现力和关于关系标准的功能失调信念对承诺产生间接影响。回避和焦虑是RSQ中的可靠因素，但是，在控制神经质的六个方面的情况下，只有焦虑才能解释满意度和承诺的变化。焦虑通过当前关系中自我的积极模型和他人的积极模型对满意度和承诺产生间接影响。得出的结论是，尽管亲密度和焦虑可能是与亲密关系相关的不同个体差异变量，并通过关系图式对关系结果产生间接影响，但还需要开展额外的工作来开发一种可靠评估它们的单一指标。
The psychometric properties of subscores from Collins and Read's (1990) Adult Attachment Scale (AAS, Ns = 61 gay, 42 lesbian, and 155 heterosexual couples) and Griffin and Bartholomew's (1994b) Relationship Scales Questionnaire (RSQ, N = 33 gay, 52 lesbian, and 79 heterosexual couples) were examined. Type of couple did not moderate any findings. Dependency and Closeness emerged as reliable factors from the AAS, but, with controls for the Big Five personality factors, neither attachment style accounted for unique variability in relationship satisfaction, and only Closeness accounted for unique variability in relationship commitment. Closeness exerted an indirect effect on commitment through both expressiveness and dysfunctional beliefs regarding relationship standards. Avoidance and Anxiety emerged as reliable factors from the RSQ, but, with controls for the six facets of Neuroticism, only Anxiety accounted for variability in satisfaction and commitment. Anxiety exerted an indirect effect on satisfaction and commitment through positive models of the self and positive models of the other in the current relationship. It is concluded that, although closeness and anxiety may be distinct individual differences variables of relevance to close relationships that exert their indirect effects on relationship outcomes through relationship schemas, additional work is needed to develop a single measure that reliably assesses them.