Desistance from Intimate Partner Violence: the Role of Legal Cynicism, Collective Efficacy, and Social Disorganization in Chicago Neighborhoods
Desistance from Intimate Partner Violence: the Role of Legal Cynicism, Collective Efficacy, and Social Disorganization in Chicago Neighborhoods
复制标题
抵制亲密伴侣暴力：法律犬儒主义、集体效能和社会解体在芝加哥社区中的作用
DOI：
10.1007/s10464-010-9362-5
复制
发表时间：
2011-12-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Wu, Shali
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Emery, Clifton R.;Jolley, Jennifer M.;Wu, Shali
本研究探讨了亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）停止与邻里集中劣势、种族异质性、居住不稳定性、集体效能和法律的犬儒主义之间的关系。来自芝加哥社区人类发展项目（PHDCN）纵向调查的数据被用于确定599例第1波IPV病例，这些病例有资格在第2波报告停止。一个广义Boosting模型被用来确定最好的近端预测IPV停止纵向数据。控制这些预测因素，逻辑回归的邻居的特点，从PHDCN社区调查被用来预测报告IPV停止波2。该研究发现，居住在法律的犬儒主义社区的参与者报告IPV停止的几率较低，控制了逻辑回归模型中的其他变量。分析发现，社区集中劣势、民族异质性、居住地不稳定性和集体效能感与IPV的停止没有关系。
This paper examined the relationship between reported Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) desistance and neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability, collective efficacy and legal cynicism. Data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) Longitudinal survey were used to identify 599 cases of IPV in Wave 1 eligible for reported desistance in Wave 2. A Generalized Boosting Model was used to determine the best proximal predictors of IPV desistance from the longitudinal data. Controlling for these predictors, logistic regression of neighborhood characteristics from the PHDCN community survey was used to predict reported IPV desistance in Wave 2. The paper finds that participants living in neighborhoods high in legal cynicism have lower odds of reporting IPV desistance, controlling for other variables in the logistic regression model. Analyses did not find that IPV desistance was related to neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability and collective efficacy.