The Myth of the ‘Traditional View of Paul’ and the Role of the Apostle in Modern Jewish-Christian Polemics
The Myth of the ‘Traditional View of Paul’ and the Role of the Apostle in Modern Jewish-Christian Polemics
复制标题
“传统保罗观”的神话以及使徒在现代犹太基督教争论中的角色
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Langton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Langton
这是犹太人对使徒保罗的两个相关研究中的第一个。第一种情况是犹太人与基督教的对话，而第二种情况是犹太人内部的意识形态辩论。很少提到的犹太作家在十九世纪之前，使徒外邦人了他的地方作为伟大的叛教者在流行的犹太人的想象，只有在现代时期。犹太人的波林奖学金随着十九世纪和二十世纪耶稣作为犹太人的救赎而发展起来。保罗的背景和教导被认为是宗教间的争论;使徒作为一种手段，使个人作家可以探索犹太教和基督教之间的关系更普遍。一些关键人物认为，在这个示意性调查的历史，犹太人的解释保罗包括海因里希Graetz，艾萨克迈耶怀斯，克劳德蒙蒂菲奥雷，考夫曼科勒，约瑟夫Krauskaupf，马丁布伯，海亚姆Maccoby，平查斯拉皮德和马克Nanos。
This is the first of two related studies of Jewish approaches to the apostle Paul. The context of the first is that of Jewish-Christian dialogue, while the context of the second is that of intra-Jewish ideological debate. Rarely mentioned by Jewish writers before the nineteenth century, the Apostle to the Gentiles took his place as the Great Apostate in the popular Jewish imagination only in the modern period. Jewish Pauline scholarship proper developed alongside the nineteenth- and twentieth-century reclamation of Jesus as a Jew. The primary context in which Paul’s background and teachings were considered was that of interfaith polemic; the apostle functioned as a means by which individual writers could explore the relationship between Judaism and Christianity more generally. Some of the key figures considered in this schematic survey of the history of the Jewish interpretation of Paul include Heinrich Graetz, Isaac Meyer Wise, Claude Montefiore, Kaufman Kohler, Joseph Krauskaupf, Martin Buber, Hyam Maccoby, Pinchas Lapide and Mark Nanos.