Conformation of sequential polypeptides of (Lysi‐Leuj), (Lysi‐Serj), and (Lys‐Gly) in sodium dodecyl sulfate solution
Conformation of sequential polypeptides of (Lysi‐Leuj), (Lysi‐Serj), and (Lys‐Gly) in sodium dodecyl sulfate solution
复制标题
(Lysi-Leuj)、(Lysi-Serj) 和 (Lys-Gly) 的连续多肽在十二烷基硫酸钠溶液中的构象
作者:
S. Kubota;K. Ikeda;Jen
A series of sequential polypeptides (LysiRj)n (R is Leu, Ser, or Gly) and random copolypeptides, (Lysx, Leuy)n, were synthesized. Their conformation in NaDodSO4 solution was determined by CD. Only (Lys‐Leu)n, (Lys‐Ser)n, and (Lys3‐Ser)n adopt a stable β‐form in the surfactant solution; (Lys‐Ser2)n, (Lys‐Ser3)n, (Lys2‐Ser2)n, and (Lys2‐Ser)n have an unstable β‐form, which reverts to an unordered form in high NaDodSO4 concentrations, even though both Ser and DodSO 4− ‐bound Lys+ are β‐formers. In contrast, (Lys‐Gly)n remains unordered in NaDodSO4 solution. On the other hand, Lys‐rich (Lys2‐Leu)n forms an unstable helix and (Lys2‐Leu2)n a stable helix in NaDodSO4 solution. In 25 mM NaDodSO4 (Lysx, Leuy)n also forms a helix up to x = 75 and reverts to the β‐form at x = 90. This compares with the helical conformation of (Lysx, Alay)n up to x = 65 and its β‐form at x = 90, suggesting that Leu is an even stronger helix‐former than Ala. Our results may provide a plausible explanation for the increase in helicity and disruption of the β‐form for many proteins in NaDodSO4 solution, that is, the polypeptide chain of a protein usually favors a helical conformation over a β‐form in the presence of excess surfactant.