Circadian typology is related to resilience and optimism in healthy adults
Circadian typology is related to resilience and optimism in healthy adults
复制标题
DOI：
10.3109/07420528.2015.1008700
复制
发表时间：
2015-05-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Adan, Ana
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Manuel Antunez, Juan;Francisco Navarro, Jose;Adan, Ana
生理节律类型学与心理健康相关的几个方面之间的关系，如生活满意度，情绪智力，感知幸福感和精神病理学之间的关系已经被记录在案。然而，他们与两个心理优势，如弹性和乐观的关系还没有被检查。因此，本研究的目的是探讨是否昼夜类型与这两种措施，考虑到性别的可能影响。1922名参与者（978名男性），年龄在18至60岁之间（30.08 +/- 10.53），完成了简化的早晨-晚上问卷（rMEQ），10项Connor-Davidson弹性量表（10项CD-RISC）和生活取向测试修订版（LOT-R）。昼夜节律类型与弹性（F-（2，F-1915）= 45.89; p < 0.001; eta（2）（p）= 0.046）和乐观（F-（2，F-1915）= 37.74; p < 0.001; eta（2）（p）= 0.038）的不同值相关，与性别无关。早晨型被试的心理弹性和乐观得分最高，而晚上型被试的心理弹性和乐观得分最低，两者均不居中（p < 0.007）。这些结果表明，晚上型的受试者可以显示较少的能力，面对逆境和积极适应，以及较少的预期发生的积极事件相比，既没有和上午型的个人。此外，这些结果提供了新的证据，可能会提高我们对昼夜节律类型与心理特征和障碍之间关系的理解。虽然未来的研究与纵向设计是必要的，所获得的结果强调，晚上型可能是一个危险因素的发展心理问题和精神障碍，而上午型可以被认为是一个保护因素。
The relationships between circadian typology and several aspects related to mental health, such as satisfaction with life, emotional intelligence, perceived well-being and psychopathological symptomatology have been documented. However, their relationships with two psychological strengths such as resilience and optimism have not been examined yet. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to explore whether circadian typology is related to both measures, taking into consideration the possible influence of sex. A sample of 1922 participants (978 men), aged between 18 and 60 yrs (30.08 +/- 10.53) completed the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ), the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item CD-RISC) and the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R). Circadian typology was associated with different values in resilience (F-(2,F-1915) = 45.89; p < 0.001; eta(2)(p) = 0.046) and optimism (F-(2,F-1915) = 37.74; p < 0.001; eta(2)(p) = 0.038), independently of the sex. Morning-type subjects showed the highest resilience and optimism scores while the lowest scores were shown by evening-type, exhibiting the neither-type subjects intermediate scores (p < 0.007, in all cases). These results suggest that evening-type subjects could display less capacity to face adversity and adapt positively, as well as less expectance of the occurrence of positive events compared to neither and morning-type individuals. In addition, these results provide new evidence that might improve our understanding about the relationships between circadian typology and psychological traits and disorders. Although future studies with longitudinal designs are needed, the obtained results emphasize that the evening-type could be a risk factor for the development of psychological problems and mental disorders, whereas the morning-type could be considered as a protective factor.