A novel approach to sustain Fe-0-electrocoagulation for Cr(VI) removal by optimizing chloride ions

A novel approach to sustain Fe-0-electrocoagulation for Cr(VI) removal by optimizing chloride ions
复制标题

通过优化氯离子维持 Fe-0 电凝聚去除 Cr(VI) 的新方法

DOI:
10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.074
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
8.6
通讯作者:
Yang Xia
Yang Xia
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xu Hai-yin;Yang Zhao-hui;Luo Yuan-ling;Zeng Guang-ming;Huang Jing;Wang Li-ke;Song Pei-pei;Yang Xia

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

氯化物(Cl−)广泛用于使用金属铁(Fe 0-EC)的电凝聚法中的去钝化。然而,它的优化仍然是一个务实的方法,因此,有限的成功。本研究提出了一种新的方法,基于系统的调查,Cl−诱导点蚀溶解行为的Fe 0-EC的pH值和Cr(VI)(0 <$Cr(VI)(mg/L)<$520)的演变。通过动电位极化、循环伏安、恒电流测试和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析表征了其钝化行为。提出的优化Cl−去钝化的方法如下:(1)建立钝化区III中点蚀溶解(MCPD)的最小Cl−浓度数据库,作为pH和Cr(VI)的函数(MCD =f(pH,Cr(VI);(2)记录pH和Cr(VI)演变的曲线函数(g)(g= {(pHi,Cr(VI)i),...,(pHf,Cr(VI)f)),在Fe 0-EC工艺中没有钝化;(3)结合曲线(g)和MCPD数据库,通过选择最大MCDs,获得用于去钝化(OCD)的Cl−的最佳浓度(OCD =Max{MCPD1,MCPD2,. MCPDn})。与响应面法相比,该方法具有更高的准确度和稳定性。
Chloride (Cl−) is widely used for depassivation in electrocoagulation using metallic iron (Fe0-EC). However, its optimization is still on a pragmatic approach and thus of limited success. This study proposed a novel approach based on a systematic investigation of Cl−–induced pitting dissolution behavior of Fe0with the evolution of pH and Cr(VI) (0 ⩽ Cr(VI) (mg/L) ⩽ 520) in Fe0-EC. The depassivation behavior was characterized by potentiodynamic polarization, cyclic voltammograms (CVs), galvanostatic measurements, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. The proposed approach to optimize Cl−for depassivation was as follows: (1) Build a database of minimum Cl−concentrations for pitting dissolution (MCPD) as a function of pH and Cr(VI) in passivation region III (MCD =f(pH, Cr(VI))); (2) Record the curve function (g) of pH and Cr(VI) evolution (g= {(pHi, Cr(VI)i), …, (pHf, Cr(VI)f)}) without passivation in the Fe0-EC process; (3) Obtain the optimal concentration of Cl−for depassivation (OCD) by selecting the maximum MCDs by combining the curve (g) and the database of MCPD (OCD =Max{MCPD1, MCPD2, … MCPDn}). This method was more accurate and stable compared with RSM.