MEMORY FOR PERSONALLY RELEVANT INFORMATION
MEMORY FOR PERSONALLY RELEVANT INFORMATION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.251
复制
发表时间：
1983-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
CARLSON, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FERGUSON, TJ;RULE, BG;CARLSON, D
特质形容词的编码和提取可能是通过对这些形容词与熟悉的他人（例如，自我或一个很受欢迎的人）的相似性进行评级来促进的。有人认为，这种促进作用反映了组织良好的图式在编码个人相关信息中的作用。本研究评估了这种解释的有效性。80名大学生首先决定积极和消极的特质形容词（a）描述自己，一个很受欢迎的人，不喜欢的人，或中性的人或（B）是可取的，可想象的，有意义的，还是熟悉的。虽然有几个结果重复过去的调查结果，其他人不支持模式视图。记忆能力评定的形容词至少和记忆自我评定的形容词一样好;记忆与之前的是非评定或这些评定的速度无关;并且正确识别的负面形容词比正面形容词多。它的结论是，这种范式没有充分评估如何组织自己和他人的知识，或如何组织影响个人相关信息的处理和检索。(23参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
The encoding and retrieval of trait adjectives are presumably facilitated by rating such adjectives for their descriptiveness of familiar others (eg, the self or a well-liked person). It has been argued that such facilitation reflects the role of well-organized schemata in the encoding of personally relevant information. The present study assessed the validity of this interpretation. 80 undergraduates first decided whether positive and negative trait adjectives (a) described themselves, a well-liked, disliked, or neutral person or (b) were desirable, imageable, meaningful, or familiar. Although several results replicate past findings, others fail to support the schema view. Memory for desirability-rated adjectives was at least as good as memory for self-rated adjectives; memory was unrelated to prior yes–no ratings or to the speed of these ratings; and more negative than positive adjectives were correctly recognized. It is concluded that this paradigm does not adequately assess how knowledge about oneself and others is organized or how such organization influences the processing and retrieval of personally relevant information.(23 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)