New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66127-5
复制
发表时间:
1996-05
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lesley K. Carr;J. Honey;Michael A.S. Jewett;D. Ibañez;Michele R. Ryan;Claire Bombardier
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lesley K. Carr;J. Honey;Michael A.S. Jewett;D. Ibañez;Michele R. Ryan;Claire Bombardier
PurposeThere is theoretical concern that stone recurrence rates may be higher following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) compared to other techniques because of residual stone debris.*Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia.Materials and MethodsWe documented all new stone formations in 298 consecutive patients who initially achieved a stone-free status following ESWL for renal calculi less than 2 cm. in largest dimension, and compared the findings to those of 62 patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ultrasonic fragmentation. Stone-free status was assessed by a centrally reviewed plain abdominal film and renal tomograms at 3 months. A plain abdominal film was repeated at 12 and 24 months to detect recurrence.ResultsNew stones formed in 22.2 percent of patients after ESWL and 4.2 percent after percutaneous nephrolithotomy at 1 year (p = 0.004), and in 34.8 percent versus 22.6 percent, respectively, at 2 years (p = 0.190). Furthermore, more new stones recurred in the lower and mid calices compared to baseline location in the ESWL group (chi-square less than 0.0001), which was not observed in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group.ConclusionsOur data support a trend toward higher stone recurrence rates in ESWL treated patients, which may be due to microscopic sand particles migrating to dependent calices and acting as a nidus for new stone formation.