New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66127-5
复制
发表时间:
1996-05
期刊:
The Journal of urology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lesley K. Carr;J. Honey;Michael A.S. Jewett;D. Ibañez;Michele R. Ryan;Claire Bombardier
Lesley K. Carr;J. Honey;Michael A.S. Jewett;D. Ibañez;Michele R. Ryan;Claire Bombardier
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lesley K. Carr;J. Honey;Michael A.S. Jewett;D. Ibañez;Michele R. Ryan;Claire Bombardier

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究目的:理论上,体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL*)后结石复发率可能高于其他技术,因为残余结石碎片。Dornier Medical Systems,Inc.,材料与方法:我们记录了298名连续患者的所有新结石形成,这些患者在ESWL治疗小于2 cm的肾结石后最初达到无结石状态。并与62例非超声碎石经皮肾镜取石术的结果进行比较。在3个月时通过中心审查的腹部平片和肾脏断层扫描评估无结石状态。在12和24个月重复腹部平片检测recursion.Results22.2%的患者ESWL和4.2%经皮肾镜取石术后1年(p = 0.004),并在34.8%与22.6%,分别在2年(p = 0.190)。此外,更多的新的结石复发在较低和中间的calices相比,基线位置在ESWL组(卡方小于0.0001),这是没有观察到在经皮肾镜取石术group.ConclusionsOur数据支持的趋势更高的结石复发率在ESWL治疗的患者,这可能是由于微观沙粒迁移到依赖calices和作为一个新的结石形成的病灶。
PurposeThere is theoretical concern that stone recurrence rates may be higher following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) compared to other techniques because of residual stone debris.*Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia.Materials and MethodsWe documented all new stone formations in 298 consecutive patients who initially achieved a stone-free status following ESWL for renal calculi less than 2 cm. in largest dimension, and compared the findings to those of 62 patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ultrasonic fragmentation. Stone-free status was assessed by a centrally reviewed plain abdominal film and renal tomograms at 3 months. A plain abdominal film was repeated at 12 and 24 months to detect recurrence.ResultsNew stones formed in 22.2 percent of patients after ESWL and 4.2 percent after percutaneous nephrolithotomy at 1 year (p = 0.004), and in 34.8 percent versus 22.6 percent, respectively, at 2 years (p = 0.190). Furthermore, more new stones recurred in the lower and mid calices compared to baseline location in the ESWL group (chi-square less than 0.0001), which was not observed in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group.ConclusionsOur data support a trend toward higher stone recurrence rates in ESWL treated patients, which may be due to microscopic sand particles migrating to dependent calices and acting as a nidus for new stone formation.