Co-Management of Natural Resources: A Comparison of Two Caribou Management Systems
Co-Management of Natural Resources: A Comparison of Two Caribou Management Systems
复制标题
自然资源的共同管理：两种驯鹿管理系统的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Simeone
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Kruse;D. Klein;S. Braund;L. Moorehead;B. Simeone
美国人类和生物圈高纬度生态系统委员会比较了阿拉斯加和加拿大的两种驯鹿管理系统。我们考察了用户参与管理与管理有效性之间的关系。管理有效性的衡量标准包括：对管理系统的了解，就可接受的收获和畜群监测做法达成的协议，对驯鹿种群变化的共同信念和看法，对管理委员会和驯鹿用户之间沟通的看法，以及对用户与管理行动合作的期望。我们的假设是，与阿拉斯加的等级制度相比，加拿大用户参与联合管理委员会将产生更大的合作和共识。我们对政府管理人员进行了一次普查，并根据两国约200名传统用户的概率样本进行了调查。我们发现：(1)在联合管理委员会下，政府管理者对用户的关切更加敏感和反应迅速；
The US Man and the Biosphere High Latitude Ecosystems Directorate compared two caribou management systems in Alaska and Canada. We examined the relationship between user involvement in management and management effectiveness. Measures of management effectiveness included: knowledge of the management system, agreement on acceptable harvest and herd monitoring practices, shared beliefs and perceptions on caribou population changes, perceptions of communications between management boards and caribou users, and expectations for cooperation of users with management actions. Our hypothesis was that the involvement of Canadian users in a joint management board would produce greater cooperation and agreement than the Alaskan hierarchical system. We conducted a census of government managers, and did surveys based on probability samples of approximately 200 traditional users in both countries. We found: (1) under a joint management board, government managers are more sensitive and responsive to user concerns; and c...