How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers' choices
How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers' choices
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11077-016-9267-8
复制
发表时间：
2017-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.3
通讯作者：
Lippi, Andrea
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Capano, Giliberto;Lippi, Andrea
政策工具是公共政策的基本组成部分。政策工具往往是政策设计过程中调解的结果，每当决策者改变现有工具而不引入任何真实的创新时。这就造成了工具选择的模仿、分层和模糊，并提出了决策者选择某些特定政策工具而不是其他政策工具的逻辑的理论问题。决策者选择某些具体手段可能有不同的理由，尽管这些理由应与决策的两个主要目的相联系，即寻求有效性和建立共同意识，即共同接受。因此，工具的选择是一个潜在的相互冲突的驱动因素的问题，决策者在被要求解决出现的问题时，必须在具体的决策情况下科普这些驱动因素。本文探讨了这一问题，并提供了一个分析框架，其基础是引导和评估工具选择的两个主要因素：合法性和工具性。决策者如何看待这两个维度所产生的边界意味着决策者只能选择四种选择模式：杂交、分层、污染或分离。
Policy instruments are a fundamental component of public policies. Policy instruments are often a result of mediation within the policy design process, whenever decision makers reshape existing instruments without introducing any real innovation. This results in imitation, layering and ambiguity in tool choice selection, and raises the theoretical problem of the logic according to which decision makers choose certain specific policy instruments rather than others. Decision makers may have different reasons for choosing certain specific instruments, although these reasons should be connected to the two main purposes of decision-making, that is, the search for effectiveness and the construction of a shared sense, a common acceptance. Thus, the choice of instruments is a question of potentially conflicting drivers that decision makers have to cope with within a specific decisional situation, when asked to solve those problems that have arisen. This paper examines this question and offers an analytical framework based on the two main factors in terms of which the selection of instruments is channelled and assessed: legitimacy and instrumentality. The boundaries created by how decision makers perceive these two dimensions mean that only four selection patterns can be chosen by decision makers: hybridization, stratification, contamination or routinization.