The cognitive interview:: A meta-analysis
The cognitive interview:: A meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/10683169908414991
复制
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Bull, R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Köhnken, G;Milne, R;Bull, R
对认知访谈对正确和不正确回忆的影响进行了荟萃分析。该数据库包括42项研究，55项个体比较，涉及近2500名受访者。一个强大的整体效果大小被发现增加正确回忆的细节与认知面试相比，控制面试（D=0.87）。增加不正确的细节，虽然相当小的整体效果大小，也是显着的认知访谈（d = 0.28）。然而，准确率（正确的细节相对于报告的细节总量的比例）在两种类型的采访中几乎是相同的（认知采访为85%，标准采访为82%）。考虑到方法学因素，发现如果使用舞台事件作为要记住的情节（与视频电影相比）并且如果受访者积极参与该事件，则正确细节的效应量更大。关于不正确的细节效应量较大的成人相比，儿童。此外，增强版的认知访谈产生了更多的错误比原来的版本。
A meta-analysis was performed on the effects of the cognitive interview on correct and incorrect recall. The database comprised 42 studies with 55 individual comparisons involving nearly 2500 interviewees. A strong overall effect size was found for the increase of correctly recalled details with the cognitive interview compared to a control interview (d=0.87). The overall effect size for the increase in incorrect details, although considerably smaller, was also significant toward the cognitive interview (d = 0.28). However, the accuracy rates (proportion of correct details relative to the total amount of details reported) were almost identical in both types of interview (85% for the cognitive interview and 82% for standard interviews, respectively). Taking methodological factors into consideration it was found that effect sizes for correct details were larger if staged events were used as the to-be-remembered episode (as compared to video films) and if the interviewees actively participated in the event. With regard to incorrect details effect sizes were larger for adults as compared to children. Furthermore, the enhanced version of the cognitive interview produced more errors than the original version.